The American Benefits Council reports that 93 million Americans get their insurance from self-funded plans. These plans serve as an alternative to employers contracting with insurance companies that assume the risk.

On March 1, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Vermont data collection law violates the U.S. Employee Retirement Security Act (ERISA). In a 6-2 decision, the high court decided that it does not apply to self-funded insurance plans used by large companies.

The state argued that requiring insurers to provide this type of data helps control the costs of healthcare and provide improvements to the overall quality of care.

The decision affirms a ruling by a federal appeals court that backed Liberty Mutual Insurance, a company that operates a self-funded plan administered by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts. The insurer challenged a data request by the state, claiming that releasing information on medical claims, including specific amounts paid, violates exemptions provided by ERISA law.

Liberty Mutual also asserted that the variations in mandates state-to-state present operational problems, a protection for employers provided by federal ERISA laws.

Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy agreed. “The fact that reporting is a principal and essential feature of ERISA demonstrates that Congress intended to pre-empt state reporting laws like Vermont’s.”.

The ruling has far-reaching implications beyond Vermont, placing limitations on similar data collection laws in 17 other states. It also affects other states’ efforts to implement pending legislation similar to Vermont’s data collection law.

ERISA-related legal matters require the help of an attorney experienced in and knowledgeable of this complex federal law.

Related Articles

ERISA 2023 Year in Review

ERISA 2023 Year in Review

Introduction The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) [1] directly impacts the lives of most Americans, yet few are familiar with ERISA despite its governance of pensions and retirement plans, along with other employer provided fringe benefits such...

Verizon Benefits Ruling Clears up Lien Burden of Proof

Verizon Benefits Ruling Clears up Lien Burden of Proof

On Jan. 29, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island recently wrote an opinion in a sort of "man bites dog" Employee Retirement Income Security Act case, Verizon Sickness & Accident Disability Benefit Plan v. Rogers.[1] Rather than the...

Reservation of Rights: Disability Insurance Claimant Guide

Reservation of Rights: Disability Insurance Claimant Guide

Applicants for disability insurance can often receive a mystifying response to their claim for benefits, an approval under a “reservation of rights.” After submitting a claim and providing a treating doctor’s certification of disability along with other medical evidence supporting a favorable claim determination, the expectation is that the claim will be approved. […]