Mark DeBofsky, founder of DeBofsky Law, was recently quoted in Behavioral Health Business, discussing a pivotal court ruling that significantly impacts behavioral health parity. The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in E.W., et al v. Health Net Life Insurance Co. established a new standard for judging legal claims under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). This ruling outlines four critical criteria for assessing parity claims, marking a crucial step in ensuring mental health benefits are treated equitably with physical health benefits.

DeBofsky’s comments underline the importance of this decision: “This is just a rampant rip-off of the American public: that they pay all this money for health insurance premiums and they incur claims based on their doctor’s treatment recommendations and the insurance companies won’t pay,” and “The opinion is going to be influential as far as how other courts will look at it. They’re not precedentially bound by the EW case. But they will undoubtedly consider it persuasive authority that may help them sort out whether a plaintiff has stated a claim for a mental health parity violation.”

This decision represents a significant advance in the ongoing fight for fair treatment in behavioral health care and could set a precedent for future cases. For more details on this influential ruling and DeBofsky’s insights, read the full article here.

Related Articles

ERISA 2023 Year in Review

ERISA 2023 Year in Review

Introduction The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) [1] directly impacts the lives of most Americans, yet few are familiar with ERISA despite its governance of pensions and retirement plans, along with other employer provided fringe benefits such...

Verizon Benefits Ruling Clears up Lien Burden of Proof

Verizon Benefits Ruling Clears up Lien Burden of Proof

On Jan. 29, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island recently wrote an opinion in a sort of "man bites dog" Employee Retirement Income Security Act case, Verizon Sickness & Accident Disability Benefit Plan v. Rogers.[1] Rather than the...

Reservation of Rights: Disability Insurance Claimant Guide

Reservation of Rights: Disability Insurance Claimant Guide

Applicants for disability insurance can often receive a mystifying response to their claim for benefits, an approval under a “reservation of rights.” After submitting a claim and providing a treating doctor’s certification of disability along with other medical evidence supporting a favorable claim determination, the expectation is that the claim will be approved. […]