A recent ruling from a federal court in Alabama – Rosen v. Provident Life and Accident Insur. Co., 2015 WL 260839 (N.D.Ala. January 21, 2015) addressed a controversial issue involving ERISA preemption. Typically, ERISA is implicated only where an employer sponsors a retirement plan or offers group coverage to its employees for disability, life, or […]
Establishing which court will have jurisdiction over an ERISA-governed claim is the first step in litigation. There are many factors that can influence the outcome of a lawsuit, or may even determine whether a case can even be brought. In ERISA cases, often the first issue that needs to be resolved is where the lawsuit […]
Congress authorized claimants seeking employee benefits due under ERISA to bring a ‘civil action’ to recover benefits due or obtain appropriate equitable relief. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplate only one form of civil action; and civil actions are to be adjudicated utilizing the procedures specified by the civil procedure […]
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are intended to apply to all civil actions adjudicated in federal court. However, without explanation, Employee Retirement Income Security Act(ERISA) cases receive different treatment, especially cases that involve disability insurance benefits. Although depositions of claim adjusters are routine in other insurance disputes, they are almost unheard of in ERISA […]
Despite the fact that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are intended to apply to all civil actions adjudicated in federal court, ERISA cases receive different treatment, especially cases that involve disability insurance benefits. In Charles v. UPS National Long Term Disability Plan, 2013 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 164218 (E.D.Pa. November 19, 2013), the court was called upon to decide whether to allow a deposition of the claim adjuster who denied benefits.
Federal courts of appeals have limited jurisdiction and may only hear appeals from final judgments. Recently, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was called upon to decide whether it had jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a benefit case decided under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Instead of entering judgment outright, the […]