Court misses the mark on disability
A decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York reveals a court’s flawed analysis of disability.
A decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York reveals a court’s flawed analysis of disability.
Dennis Paese, a long-time employee and director of labor relations for Sequa Corporation, was severely injured in a car accident. Paese v. Hartford Life and Accident Insur. Co., 2006 U.S.App.LEXIS 13007 (2d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals May 24,2006).
It is fascinating how far Judge Richard A. Posner has come. Posner wrote the opinion in Rud v. Liberty Life Assur.Co.,438 F.3d 772 (7th Cir. 2006). However, in Van Boxel v. The Journal Co. Employees’ Pension Trust, 836 F.2d 1048, 1052 (7th Cir. 1987), he wrote:
Giddens v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of the U.S., 2006 U.S.App.LEXIS 8970 (11th Cir. April 12, 2006). The plaintiff, a dentist, purchased two ”own occupation” disability policies from Equitable. Both policies contained provisions for total disability as well as residual (partial) disability. The issue before the court was whether Allen Giddens was totally or partially […]
In a very significant ruling, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended several recent precedents to reject an insurer’s reviewing doctor’s findings and uphold a judgment reinstating payment of disability benefits. Evans v. Unum Provident Corp., 2006 U.S.App.LEXIS 1359 (Jan. 20, 2006). The plaintiff, a nursing-home administrator, became disabled due to a seizure disorder […]
The plaintiff, a pharmaceutical sales representative, suffered from degenerative spinal disc disease, which progressively worsened to the point where he could no longer maintain employment.