Federal judge William Conley issued a ruling on August 19, 2013 in the case of Freeland v. Unum, No. 11cv53 (opinion_and_order.pdf) finding that Unum acted arbitrarily and capriciously in terminating long-term disability payments owed to Bruce Freeland. The court determined that Unum improperly disregarded the combination of Freeland’s cardiac and psychiatric impairments, the impact of his work environment on the plaintiff’s overall medical condition, and the risk that his condition would worsen if he were to return to that work environment. The court also awarded plaintiff his attorney’s fees.

A more detailed account of the ruling will be posted in the near future.

 

Related Articles

ERISA Venue Provisions: Where Can You File Your Benefits Lawsuit?

ERISA Venue Provisions: Where Can You File Your Benefits Lawsuit?

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governs private sector employee benefits plans, including retirement, disability, and health plans. One of the key aspects of ERISA litigation is the question of venue — where participants or beneficiaries file their lawsuits when they believe their plan rights are violated. […]

How to File a Winning ERISA Claim

How to File a Winning ERISA Claim

If you have an employment-related benefit claim, ERISA likely applies to your claim. ERISA claims involve complex rules and strict deadlines that can be challenging and challenging to navigate. […]

Disability Ruling Guides On Cases With Uncertain Causation

Disability Ruling Guides On Cases With Uncertain Causation

Deciding disability benefit claims correctly can often pose a challenge for both claimants and insurers. Since disability is dependent on functional restrictions and not just on a diagnosis, determining a claimant’s level of functionality with respect to basic activities such as sitting, standing and walking can be difficult, especially when disability results from symptoms such as pain. […]