Short-term and long-term disability plans are supposed to provide workers and professionals with coverage to make ends meet when a serious medical impairment or injury takes the person away from work. Not everybody participates in these insurance plans. In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics says the roughly 39 percent of people working in private industry 2014 had short-term disability (STD) coverage and 33 percent carries long-term disability (LTD) coverage. Of those in management and professional positions the participation rate was significantly higher.

LTD Insurance Claim Disputes Lead The Pack In Employee Benefits Litigation

Unfortunately, research indicates that obtaining the benefits due under a disability insurance policy when a problem arises is not as easy as it should be — even with a valid claim. A law lecturer in Illinois who is well-respected for his knowledge of employee benefits issues looked into employee benefits litigation across the spectrum of types of claims — health care claims, pension disputes, life insurance and accidental death claims, as well as LTD coverage litigation.

While disability insurance participation rates are generally far lower than the other forms of employee benefits programs, the research (published in the ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law) shows that 60 percent of employee benefits lawsuits filed in federal court between 2006 and 2010 involved LTD insurance disputes. The insurance companies have a great deal of power in handling claims.

The Insurance Providers May Deny A Claim, But Is That The End Of The Story?

Many of the legal challenges in the research involved unfair denials of claims. The lead researcher says that because the insurance companies take care of administering the employee benefits plan, have the power to decide whether or not to deny the claim and, if the business decides to pay benefits under the policy, it is the insurance company that has to pay. Do the math. The insurance providers likely do. The odds are stacked against granting benefits under the insurance policy with the system as it is – providing the administrator and provider with the power of choice.

It is critical for professionals and other workers who are relying on an insurance policy to know that a denial is not always the end of the story. At the first sign of delay or other trouble in obtaining benefits it may be a good idea to speak with an experienced Illinois lawyer who is well-versed in short-term and long-term disability insurance issues to protect your rights.

Related Articles

What Damages Are Available If You File a Lawsuit Seeking ERISA Benefits?

What Damages Are Available If You File a Lawsuit Seeking ERISA Benefits?

Many employers offer robust benefits packages in addition to monetary compensation. Those benefits can be critical to ensuring your family’s health and financial security. If your benefits claim has been denied, it is essential to understand the applicable laws and damages available in litigation. […]

Marie E. Casciari to Present at PLI’s ‘The Evolving Landscape of Health and Welfare Benefits and ERISA Fiduciary Rules 2023’ in Chicago

We are pleased to announce that Marie E. Casciari of DeBofsky Law will be presenting at the Practising Law Institute’s (PLI) “The Evolving Landscape of Health and Welfare Benefits and ERISA Fiduciary Rules 2023” seminar on “2023 Health and Welfare Litigation Updates.” This hybrid event will be held in Chicago on October 30, 2023, but also offers the opportunity to participate online. […]

Why is the term “Arbitrary and Capricious” So Important in Relation to Disability, Life, Accidental Death, and Medical Benefits from an Employer-Sponsored Benefit Plan?

Why is the term “Arbitrary and Capricious” So Important in Relation to Disability, Life, Accidental Death, and Medical Benefits from an Employer-Sponsored Benefit Plan?

Individuals seeking disability, life, accidental death, or even health benefits under employer-sponsored group benefit plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) may have their claims thwarted due to what is known as either the “arbitrary and capricious” or “abuse of discretion” standard of judicial review. […]