You have likely heard of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that establishes minimum standards for pension plans in private industry. But, do you know anything about the agency that manages it? To best understand ERISA, it is important to know the history and structure of the agency that manages it.

Pensions have a complicated history in the United States dating back to the Progressive Era of the early 1900s. Many agencies have been involved in the management and regulation of pensions since then.

The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), which falls under the Department of Labor, is tasked with the administration, regulation and enforcement of Title I of ERISA. The EBSA is in charge of one aspect of ERISA, but the agency was founded in 1970 before the law was passed in 1974. Prior to ERISA, the EBSA and the Department of Labor shared a somewhat overlapping role with the Internal Revenue Service in the regulation of pensions.

How did ERISA affect the EBSA?

Since ERISA passed in 1974, the titles of the law have clarified the job descriptions of each agency. Title I, which is the responsibility of the EBSA, protects the interests of employee benefit plan participants and beneficiaries. Title II, which is the responsibility of the IRS, defines the standards of employee benefit plans to receive favorable tax treatment under the law.

In simpler terms, the EBSA protects the interest of those invested in pension programs while the IRS protects the government’s interest in funding the law.

Expansion of the EBSA

Key pieces of legislation have expanded the authority of the EBSA since 1984. Laws related to HIPPA, fiduciary investment, and responsibility, rights of beneficiaries and health care requirements of government employees now fall under EBSA.

The agency now employs 1,000 people in Washington D.C. and is led by the Assistant Security of Labor for Employee Benefits, a position that is filled via Presidential nomination and confirmation by the Senate.

When should you go to a lawyer versus the EBSA?

You can file a report against an employer through the EBSA. The agency will investigate your claim and seek action against the employer, but they do not have the capacity to seek compensation on your behalf.

Because ERISA law is complex, government agencies can be inefficient in the handling of your claim. This is where a claims law firm can step in to help aggressively defend your rights and the benefits owed to you.

Related Articles

How Can I Tell If My Benefit Plan Is Governed by ERISA?

How Can I Tell If My Benefit Plan Is Governed by ERISA?

ERISA is an acronym for the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Most people have never heard of ERISA, but its comprehensiveness impacts the vast majority of American workers and their dependents. The original intent behind ERISA’s enactment was to remedy pension plan abuses; however, just prior to Congress’ passage of the ERISA law, the scope […]

How to Defeat Ambiguities in Disability Insurance Claim Forms

How to Defeat Ambiguities in Disability Insurance Claim Forms

The start of every disability insurance claim is the completion of forms the claimants is required to submit to receive benefits. While the forms are ostensibly designed to be clear and straightforward, the questions asked on the disability insurance claim forms often confuse claimants, and ambiguities in disability insurance claim forms can lead to misunderstandings and delays in the processing of claims. […]

Severance Pact Forecloses Right To Pursue Disability Claim Later

Severance Pact Forecloses Right To Pursue Disability Claim Later

Lawyers who represent employees in severance negotiations should be aware and take heed of the recent New York federal court ruling in Schuyler v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 2023 WL 2388757 (S.D. N.Y., March 7, 2023). That case illustrated a dangerous pitfall that may unwittingly result in unintended unfortunate consequences based on the court’s finding that an employee’s release of her employer also waived the employee’s right to sue her disability insurer. […]