According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accidents are the fifth leading cause of death in the United States. Will your loved ones be financially protected should you succumb to an untimely death due to an accident?

Accidental death and dismemberment insurance (AD&D) may be purchased in addition to traditional life insurance or offered by your employer as a supplemental life insurance benefit your family extra financial security in the event of unexpected misfortune. Taking out AD&D insurance is an excellent way to protect those closest to you. It offers many policyholders peace of mind. However, AD&D insurance is complex and even a sudden and unexpected death may not qualify.

Understanding what qualifies as an “accidental death” according to most insurers

As the name states, an AD&D benefit specifically covers deaths that occur by accidental means and/or methods.  While requirements vary among insurance companies, generally an accidental death not caused by war or as a result of engaging in illegal activities meets the requirements for a policy pay-out.  Nor will death that occurs on account of natural causes ordinarily be covered even if death occurs suddenly; i.e., a heart attack or stroke absent an external triggering cause.  Nor is death by suicide or due to attempted suicide generally covered.  Some policies also exclude death that results from a drunk driving accident or use of illegal narcotics/substances.

Your recourse if the insurer denies a claim

If you or anyone you know has been denied benefits for an AD&D claim, an experienced attorney can help you navigate an appeal or file a lawsuit challenging the denial.

On behalf of DeBofsky Sherman Casciari Reynolds P.C.

Related Articles

Is your retirement plan governed by ERISA?

Is your retirement plan governed by ERISA?

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 was passed by Congress primarily to protect employee retirement benefits by establishing requirements to assure that promised benefits are delivered. One of the principal reasons that Congress was spurred to pass the ERISA law was the bankruptcy of the Studebaker car company in the 1960s. When the car maker failed, its workers learned to their surprise and disappointment that their promised pensions were not going to be paid to them […]

High court social security ruling’s implications for ERISA

It is a generally accepted tenet in litigation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act that claimants challenging benefit denials must first exhaust prelitigation claim appeals as a condition precedent to filing suit. While an administrative exhaustion requirement applies to claim exhaustion, whether ERISA claimants are barred from raising new issues in court that were not previously asserted in their claim appeals remains open to question. […]