When you are ill and a doctor recommends a course of treatment, you naturally assume that your health insurer will reimburse the cost.  That is not always the case, though, and it is not uncommon for health insurance benefits to be denied, especially if the costs are high.  Examples of types of claims that are frequently denied include:

  • Cancer care involving treatment such as stem cell transplantation, proton beam therapy, or newly developed high-cost medications;
  • Air ambulance transportation;
  • Residential treatment for behavioral health conditions; and
  • Emergency out-of-network treatment

Insurers even challenge emergency room visits if, after the fact, it appears such treatment could have been provided elsewhere.

Decisions about whether services are covered or excluded begin with the terms of the plan or policy, which all contain explicit exclusions for non-covered services that are not medically necessary.  Most insurers have also developed policies covering specific care or treatments, which can usually be researched on the internet.  Such policies quickly become outdated with new medical advances, though, and some policies are simply inconsistent with accepted standards of medical care.

Another major source of denials or inadequate reimbursement is the growing popularity of association or so-called short-term health benefits policies that do not have to incorporate essential benefits mandated by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  If the premium cost for a policy appears too good to be true, be wary.  Consumers buying individual health insurance policies should always ascertain the coverage they are purchasing meets the requirements of the ACA.

How Can Insurance Benefit Denials Be Challenged

Just because an insurance company says no to a claim, that does not mean the insurance company’s decision cannot be challenged.  If coverage was provided through your employer, you automatically have appeal rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) if you work in the private sector.  Plans governed by the ACA are also mandated to require an independent external review of benefit denials upon request.

When a doctor prescribes a drug or course of treatment that is not approved by insurance, the doctor should be prepared to justify the decision and may need to write a letter of medical necessity offering a rationale that not only explains why the treatment has been recommended, but also advises on why lower priced or less intensive alternatives are contra-indicated or would be ineffective.

Challenging health benefit denials can be extremely difficult, though.  Insurance companies have lawyers and other resources to defend their claim denials; and patients dealing with severe illness are usually not in the best situation to challenge claim denials on their own.  Keep in mind that insurance claims are legal claims – having an experienced and knowledgeable health insurance lawyer fighting for you is the best weapon you can employ.  We’re here to help.

Related Articles

Understanding Government and Church Plan Exceptions to ERISA

Understanding Government and Church Plan Exceptions to ERISA

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) is a landmark piece of legislation enacted in 1974 to safeguard the interests of employees who participate in retirement and health benefit plans offered by their employers. ERISA sets standards for these plans, ensuring transparency, fiduciary responsibility, and fairness in their administration. […]

ERISA 2023 Year in Review

ERISA 2023 Year in Review

Introduction The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) [1] directly impacts the lives of most Americans, yet few are familiar with ERISA despite its governance of pensions and retirement plans, along with other employer provided fringe benefits such...