According to USA Today, the stock market gained 20 percent last year, making 2017 one of the best years for stocks since Y2K. A natural result of these gains was a rise in the value of 401(k) or 403(b) investments for consumers around the country. While the money in 401(k) and 403(b) accounts grew, so did the litigation surrounding the fiduciary duties of their providers to limit excessive fees charged to plan participants. What could change as the result of the litigation and how does it affect you as the beneficiary of a 401(k) or 403(b) account?

The potential for changes due to 401(k) litigation is important to everyone saving for retirement because new rulings can affect the way your company’s plan is managed. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, also known as ERISA, companies receive guidance on how to operate retirement accounts. The law establishes that employers and benefits managers are subject to fiduciary duties that require them to manage retirement plans with the best interests of their beneficiaries in mind.

Defining fiduciary duty through litigation

Consumer access to technology and financial innovation is changing plan offerings and how employees choose to invest their retirement benefits. According to the Center for Retirement Research (CRR), retiree benefits litigation on three areas including:

  • Investment choices and monitoring by fiduciaries
  • Fees charged by fiduciaries
  • Self-dealing in violation of fiduciary obligations

Each of these affects the balance between a company’s ability to administer and offer a plan and the consumer’s ability to grow their retirement savings. It is important to remember that employers are not required to provide retirement plans under ERISA, but they are required to operate them under a specific set of minimum standards.

Accounting for changes

As shown by the CRR, most litigation does not directly address beneficiaries’ investment returns, but instead addresses practices that can significantly reduce investment growth such as failure to monitor whether available investments remain prudent choices or whether fees charged by particular funds exceed benchmarks. Although the risk of losses due to market fluctuations remains the responsibility of the individual investor, such declines should not result from imprudent actions by the plan’s sponsors and benefit managers.

As a beneficiary, you should expect your retirement plan to be run with your best interests in mind in order to meet the goal of providing retirement security. If you believe your retirement assets are not being managed appropriately, you should consult with an attorney knowledgeable about the issues that govern the fiduciary obligations you are owed.

Related Articles

How Can I Tell If My Benefit Plan Is Governed by ERISA?

How Can I Tell If My Benefit Plan Is Governed by ERISA?

ERISA is an acronym for the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Most people have never heard of ERISA, but its comprehensiveness impacts the vast majority of American workers and their dependents. The original intent behind ERISA’s enactment was to remedy pension plan abuses; however, just prior to Congress’ passage of the ERISA law, the scope […]

How to Defeat Ambiguities in Disability Insurance Claim Forms

How to Defeat Ambiguities in Disability Insurance Claim Forms

The start of every disability insurance claim is the completion of forms the claimants is required to submit to receive benefits. While the forms are ostensibly designed to be clear and straightforward, the questions asked on the disability insurance claim forms often confuse claimants, and ambiguities in disability insurance claim forms can lead to misunderstandings and delays in the processing of claims. […]

Severance Pact Forecloses Right To Pursue Disability Claim Later

Severance Pact Forecloses Right To Pursue Disability Claim Later

Lawyers who represent employees in severance negotiations should be aware and take heed of the recent New York federal court ruling in Schuyler v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 2023 WL 2388757 (S.D. N.Y., March 7, 2023). That case illustrated a dangerous pitfall that may unwittingly result in unintended unfortunate consequences based on the court’s finding that an employee’s release of her employer also waived the employee’s right to sue her disability insurer. […]