Court Looks at Critical Issues Involving Syndrome
A ruling issued by a federal court in California illustrates a number of critical issues involving a claim for disability benefits due to chronic fatigue syndrome.
A ruling issued by a federal court in California illustrates a number of critical issues involving a claim for disability benefits due to chronic fatigue syndrome.
Despite significant medical advances in recent years, many debilitating impairments remain impossible to diagnose through imaging such as x-ray or MRI, electrodiagostic testing, or blood tests. Consequently, due to potential uncertainty as to the legitimacy of such conditions, disability insurers have adopted policy provisions that purport to limit payments for conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic […]
A decision by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has taken a controversial position in the ongoing case of Pettaway v. Board of Trustees of Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan.
Court decisions have grappled with the challenges of the ERISA limitations period.
Conflict of interest in the administration of benefit claims is a topic that has long concerned Judge William Acker Jr. of the Northern District of Alabama. Blankenship v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Civ. No. 08-AR-0639-S (N.D. Ala., Dec. 30) is merely the latest in a series of rulings critical of the manner in which courts have treated ERISA cases.
The arbitrary and capricious standard of review gives employers such broad discretion to interpret benefit plan provisions that a literal reading of the plan can be overridden according to Wallace v. Johnson & Johnson, 2009 U.S.App.LEXIS 22529 (1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Oct. 14). Wallace, who spent 14 years as a manager with Johnson […]