Court takes controversial position in Pettaway
A decision by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has taken a controversial position in the ongoing case of Pettaway v. Board of Trustees of Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan.
Courts face challenges with ERISA, limitations period
Court decisions have grappled with the challenges of the ERISA limitations period.
ERISA: A Frankenstein Made Up of Different Laws
Conflict of interest in the administration of benefit claims is a topic that has long concerned Judge William Acker Jr. of the Northern District of Alabama. Blankenship v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Civ. No. 08-AR-0639-S (N.D. Ala., Dec. 30) is merely the latest in a series of rulings critical of the manner in which courts have treated ERISA cases.
When a literal reading can be overridden
The arbitrary and capricious standard of review gives employers such broad discretion to interpret benefit plan provisions that a literal reading of the plan can be overridden according to Wallace v. Johnson & Johnson, 2009 U.S.App.LEXIS 22529 (1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Oct. 14). Wallace, who spent 14 years as a manager with Johnson […]
Ruling exposes defects in insurer’s determination
Functional capacity evaluations are frequently used in disability insurance evaluations. While some courts have deemed such testing reliable, Alfano v. Cigna Life Ins.Co. of N.Y., 2009 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 7688 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30), offers an object lesson as to why courts need to be careful in assessing such tests. The plaintiff in Alfano worked in an administrative […]