Those diagnosed with cancer are fighting many battles. They not only have to deal with their health, but they also have to deal with paying for healthcare. Cancer patents rely on their health insurance to provide coverage for effective healthcare. Unfortunately, some insurance carriers sidestep their responsibilities when it comes to patient care for those with cancer.

Results from a New Survey

Patients Rising and CancerConnect recently conducted a survey of cancer patients. They found that insurance carriers often deny claims as a matter of course or drop certain drugs or treatments from approved care suddenly.

Insurance companies may even force cancer patients into less-effective treatments despite a physician’s recommendation. In fact, 61 percent of those surveyed stated that when they cannot afford the co-payment for prescriptions they will either take a different drug or no drugs at all.

Many patients also report dramatic increases in premium amounts and large surges in out-of-pocket payments as well. The survey also indicated that 73 percent of those surveyed thought that insurance issues were both time consuming and stressful. This is extremely unfortunate–dealing with the insurance company is the last thing that a cancer patient needs to worry about.

What Does This Mean for Cancer Patients?

The survey ultimately indicates that insurance companies are treating cancer patients unfairly and unreasonably in an effort to cut costs.

Insurance companies have a duty to deal with their insureds in good faith. If they are making costs higher for cancer patients simply because they have cancer, that may mean that they are acting in bad faith.

You may have a legal claim for this type of treatment. Experienced legal counsel can help you fight back if you feel like you are being treated wrongly by your insurance company in a benefits situation.

Related Articles

Severance Pact Forecloses Right To Pursue Disability Claim Later

Severance Pact Forecloses Right To Pursue Disability Claim Later

Lawyers who represent employees in severance negotiations should be aware and take heed of the recent New York federal court ruling in Schuyler v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 2023 WL 2388757 (S.D. N.Y., March 7, 2023). That case illustrated a dangerous pitfall that may unwittingly result in unintended unfortunate consequences based on the court’s finding that an employee’s release of her employer also waived the employee’s right to sue her disability insurer. […]

The Important Role Of Contra Proferentem In ERISA Cases

The Important Role Of Contra Proferentem In ERISA Cases

The outcome of Employee Retirement Income Security Act cases often turns on how courts interpret the meaning of specific benefit plan terms. The recently decided case of Stein v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, issued by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on March 16, illustrates what happens when plan terms are unclear and can have different meanings. […]

Courts Should Follow 8th Circ. On ERISA Procedure Rules

There is no provision in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 mandating that claimants must exhaust internal appeals as a precondition to filing a lawsuit to challenge a claim denial. Nonetheless, most courts have required claimants to exhaust prelitigation appeals before their cases may be heard in court. […]