On July 27, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit handed down a decision in the case of Berg v. New York Life Ins. Co. reversing an adverse judgment in the district court against DeBofsky, Sherman & Casciari’s client, Eric Berg. The court of appeals found in Berg’s favor on two significant issues: First, the court ruled that a claimant for disability benefits did not have to be under a doctor’s care for the claimed disabling condition as of the date the claim arose. The court found the policy lacked such a temporal requirement and that its terminology was ambiguous on the issue. Second, the court found that if the insured is unemployed when he submits a claim, his “regular job” is the occupation that was last performed, not the so-called occupation of “unemployed person.”

This ruling is significant on both issues and will no doubt be cited frequently in future litigation involving disability benefits. Furthermore, yet again, it highlights the importance of retaining an experienced disability benefits attorney when your claim has been denied and you feel cheated. The insurance companies employ a battalion of lawyers to minimize the money they have to pay for claims. Similarly, as an injured or disabled person, you need an attorney on your side to protect your interests.

Related Articles

How Denial Of Autism Care Coverage Can Breach ERISA Duty

According to statistics compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about one in 54 children has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, which is considered a developmental disability associated with social, communication and behavioral issues. Although there is no known cure for autism, children with autism may be helped with behavioral treatment such as applied behavioral analysis, or ABA, and early intensive behavioral intervention, or IBT, a subtype of ABA treatment. […]

Judge casts doubt over administrative exhaustion doctrine for ERISA claims

One of the major differences between insurance litigation in general and litigation of disputes involving health, life or disability insurance under the ERISA law is in relation to preconditions to bringing suit. Even though ERISA cases are not subject to administrative law, federal courts have incorporated the doctrine of administrative […]