Articles

Updates on the latest in benefits news and practical pointers for your benefits-related issues.

Back to Insights

Headaches and Disability: A Detailed Case Analysis

Proving an entitlement to disability benefits on account of headaches can be extremely challenging. Unlike many other disabilities that can be objectively diagnosed by MRI, x-ray, or blood tests, “objective” proof of headaches can be elusive. The proof difficulties can be even more challenging if the benefit plan requires objective medical evidence.  How then can […]

If sufficient medical evidence absent, consider vocational skill level

Many disability insurance policies evaluate an insured’s earning capacity to determine entitlement to benefits. For an insurance company to be able to assess earning capacity, the insured’s education and work experience are critical factors. A recent ruling from the federal court in Chicago, Contreras v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 2017 WL 1493701 (N.D. […]

Fibromyalgia recognized as a disabling impairment

Attorneys Mark DeBofsky and Bridget O’Ryan secured a victory in the U.S. Court of Appeals on May 18, 2017 in a disability benefit case involving fibromyalgia – Kennedy v. Lilly Extended Disability Plan, 2017 WL 2178091 (7th Cir. May 18, 2017)(available at Final Opinion). The court began its ruling by announcing that this case is about fibromyalgia, and […]

Surveillance, social media investigations, and tactics insurance companies use to deny disability insurance claims

Insurance companies often hire private investigators to find ways to deny or discontinue payment of disability insurance benefits. The tactics that big business uses to develop evidence seems to expand as technology changes. For years, insurance companies have sent investigators to conduct undercover surveillance stake outs, hoping to secure video evidence that a claimant is not really disabled, […]

Discovery in ERISA Cases

DeBofsky Law recently received a ruling from Judge Robert Dow, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Harding v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, 2017 WL 1316264 (N.D. Ill. April 10, 2017), which thoughtfully analyzed the scope of  available discovery in an ERISA action adjudicated under the de novo standard of judicial review. 

Case Guidelines not Meant as Rigid formula that Dictates Outcome

A recent ruling from the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an insurance company’s denial of health-care benefits for psychiatric treatment. Although the underlying facts are compelling, the most interesting aspect of the ruling was the court’s discussion of civil procedure and judicial standards of review under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Question of disability for pharmacist on narcotics doesn’t halt insurer

There are some medical conditions that produce such severe pain that only narcotic medication can relieve the distress. In such situations, a question has arisen in several disability insurance cases as to whether taking narcotic pain medication is disabling in and of itself if either licensure issues or strict corporate policies prohibit an employee from […]

Get Results. Contact Us to Get Started

Whether this is your first filing or you need an appeal, we'll review your case, and work with you to get it resolved in your favor. It's your money. Let's get you justice.

Request a Consultation