Articles

Updates on the latest in benefits news and practical pointers for your benefits-related issues.

Back to Insights

Federal court revives disability claim for schizoaffective disorder

Most group disability insurance policies limit the duration of benefit payments for mental impairments. An interesting ruling out of Pennsylvania focuses on what constitutes a “mental impairment.” In Berkoben v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 2014 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 39385 (W.D.Pa., Feb. 21), a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court recommended overturning Aetna’s termination of benefits based […]

Can a law banning discretionary clauses apply to an event occurring prior to the legislative enactment?

In Cerone v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.Co., 2014 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 46529 (S.D.Cal. March 28, 2014), after the plaintiff’s accidental death claim based on the death of her husband was denied and her appeal exhausted, Debra Cerone filed suit against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. The issue decided in this opinion was whether the de novo or abuse of discretion standard of review applied.

‘Bad faith’ not required in awarding fees

Fee awards made pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s (ERISA) fee-shifting statutory provision (29 U.S.C. Section 1132(g)) are a critical part of ERISA litigation. A ruling last month from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Donachie v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 2014 U.S.App.LEXIS 4593 (2nd Cir. March 11, 2014), clarified […]

DeBofsky Law Wins Disability Benefits for Law Firm Partner

In Fontaine v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Co., 2014 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 41253 (N.D.Ill. March 27, 2014), DeBofsky, Sherman & Casciari scored a major victory in securing an award of long-term disability insurance for a partner in a major law firm. The plaintiff, Mary Fontaine, enjoyed a successful career as a partner practicing in the field of structured finance for the law firm of Mayer Brown in Chicago where she worked for thirty years.

Meguerditchian v. Aetna Life Ins.Co., 2014 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 23910 (C.D.Cal. February 21, 2014)

The plaintiff, Nerses Meguerditchian, was initially employed by FedEx in 1991 as a technician who repaired vehicles and ground equipment operated by the company. In 2011, the plaintiff injured his back while working on a vehicle, but participated in FedEx’s temporary return to work program following his injury until April 2011 when he ceased working […]

Collins v. Liberty Life Assur.Co. of Boston, 2013 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 174237 (C.D.Cal. December 11, 2013)

Long-term disability insurance cases involving fibromyalgia present special difficulties because there are no objective tests for the condition other than a clinical “trigger-point” test. A recent ruling from California handled by attorney Michael McKuin and decided by Judge Dolly Gee presents an interesting and thorough discussion of such a claim that stands out in noting […]

High court decision provides some guidance on ERISA limitations periods

Statutes of limitation can be very confusing in Employee Retirement Income Security Act cases. Since the provision of ERISA that authorizes claimants to sue to recover benefits (29 U.S.C. Section 1132(a)(1)(B)) lacks its own statute of limitations, courts borrow the most analogous limitations period under state law. But if the benefit plan contains its own […]

How courts interpret the meaning of ‘civil action’

Congress authorized claimants seeking employee benefits due under ERISA to bring a ‘civil action’ to recover benefits due or obtain appropriate equitable relief. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplate only one form of civil action; and civil actions are to be adjudicated utilizing the procedures specified by the civil procedure […]

Long-term care insurance denial leads to lawsuit

A recently filed lawsuit focuses on one of the pitfalls in long-term care insurance, a critical area of practice for DeBofsky, Sherman & Casciari. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Connecticut, and titled, “Gardner v. CNA Financial,” , alleges that Chicago-based CNA, a major long-term care insurer, wrongfully denied coverage for services provided in […]

A lesson in disgorgement

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act law creates a number of perverse incentives for insurers that administer benefit claims. Without the availability of remedies beyond the restoration of benefits due, insurers can earn significant profits on delayed payments. A recent 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of North America, […]

Get Results. Contact Us to Get Started

Whether this is your first filing or you need an appeal, we'll review your case, and work with you to get it resolved in your favor. It's your money. Let's get you justice.

Request a Consultation